Re: Signed Headers

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2000 - 03:41:44 CDT


In <20000630073517.B3320@main.templetons.com> Brad Templeton <brad@templetons.com> writes:

>Are there occasions where an injecting agent must modify an existing
>header if the posting agent was conformant?

It depends whether the injecting agent takes the same view of
"conformance" as the posting agent. I wouldn't like to rely on it.

Moreover, injecting agents also have a tendency to regard conformance as a
matter of conforming to the "house style". Things like preferred
conventions for headers (Message-ID: Messgae-Id: Message-id:).

>Any signing posting agent is modern and has a duty to be conformant.

And since when have injecting sites regarded "duty" as a prime concern?
Life ain't like that.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Email:     chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk  Web:   http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9     Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7  65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.