Re: RFC 1036 Revision: Replaces/Supersedes/Xref Headers

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Wed Mar 01 2000 - 16:07:03 CST


Brad Templeton <brad@templetons.com> writes:

> Well, to that I agree. I have always preferred replace-in place.
> However it's not dreadfully hard. You look at the xref, you see if it
> refers to an article that was read, and you don't show it if so.

I believe that part of what Andrew is saying is that building that Xref in
the first place is difficult to do in a clustered environment.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.