Re: Mail-Copies-To.00

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 06:05:45 CDT


In <86vgvd9avm.fsf@strangepork.interhack.net> Matt Curtin <cmcurtin@interhack.net> writes:

>>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> writes:

> Charles> 6.2. Posted-And-Mailed

> Charles> Posted-And-Mailed-content = "yes" / "no"

>This doesn't belong here. There needs to be a separate document that
>deals with it. I have not been pushing this document and the
>companion Message-ID header generation document because there are
>more important issues that should be getting resolved here, namely
>documentation and standardization of current practice.

The only reason I have brought the Posted-And-Mailed header back into play
is that we have agreed to look at Mail-Copies-To, and the one seems to
depend on the other (like MCT specifies when PAM should be used).

>The other part of the reason that this doesn't belong here is because
>it affects how mail works and we can't be specifying recommendations
>or standards for how mail works in a USEFOR document.

No, it specifies how certain emails sent from news posting/followup agents
should be structured. I think that is OK within USEFOR.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Email:     chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk  Web:   http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9     Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7  65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.