From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel@acm.org)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 05:31:53 CDT
In <20001002071026.403.qmail@kairos.algonet.se>, on 10/02/2000
at 07:10 AM, sommar@algonet.se (Erland Sommarskog) said:
>Problem is that that would be a mail agent, which is not covered by
>this standard.
This draft describes the meaning of the header; it does prescribe the
behavior of the mail agent. Were it to do the latter then I would
agree that it is misplaced.
>For a Posted-and-Mailed header to be meaningful, it
>would have to be part of the mail standard.
Now that might be a problem, since we want this to be considered a
valid header in mail and we don't want it to be defined with some
other meaning. Has anyone touched bases with DRUMS about reserving
this header name?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
Team OS/2
Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------