Re: Mail-Copies-To.00

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Terje Bless (link@tss.no)
Date: Wed Oct 04 2000 - 16:06:42 CDT


On 04.10.00 at 10:56, John Stanley <stanley@peak.org> wrote:

>"The blurb will need to be there forever. "
>
>The "blurb" should never be there. It's time to squash all these agents
>that think that adding content to messages in the body is the right thing
>to do. It's forgery.

Think of it as something akin to adding a signature. We shouldn't say it
"MUST" or "SHOULD" be put in. We should say it "MAY" be put in with a
"NOTE: until reading agents support PAM, posting agents may wish to include
a text blurb in the body of the message".

-- 
As a cat owner, I know this for a fact...
Nothing says "I love you" like a decapitated gopher on your front porch.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.