From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Oct 05 2000 - 05:53:33 CDT
In <86itr8jlvk.fsf@strangepork.interhack.net> Matt Curtin <cmcurtin@interhack.net> writes:
>I discussed the matter with the chair, who specifically said that we
>should hold off on PAM until USEFOR is finished. So I'm trying to
>play my part in keeping this from being the largest document never
>produced. Do we ever want to produce an RFC? We've been at it for
>four years now...
The only reason we are discussing PAM is because it interacts with MCT.
Either we include both, or we include neither. You will notice that I am
not trying to include any of the other interesting ideas from the draft
that you and Jamie wrote.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506 Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5