From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 03:45:42 CDT
In <rjn1gj7cjd.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk> Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:
>Well, basically I like the PAM solution because it is existing
>practice. A comment would not help, as comments are not structured.
>A references header would not help, as many reply agents already
>genererate references headers. However, including a Path header in
>the mail might do the trick, and could also be argued as existing
>practice (Pine uses the path header to distinguish between mail and
>news). It will be less obvious, though.
I don't think my draft requires any Path header in the email version
(though I imagine some agents might include a Path with a short tail
entry, just because that was the easy way to do it).
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506 Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5