From: Erland Sommarskog (sommar@algonet.se)
Date: Sat Sep 02 2000 - 14:03:01 CDT
Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk) writes:
> >> 4. A.O.B.
>
>
> >This was so long time ago, that I even can't recall what A.O.B. stands
> >for.
>
> "Any Other Business"
C.O.W with other words, (Can of Worms).
Assuming that the idea of getting a standards-track RFC out relatively
soon (which I still guess would take a year if we start now), with
mainly existing practice and adding simple or essential new features,
I think we should try to identity all features that we have introduced
beyond existing practice, and as Jonathan Grobe suggested have some
sort of poll on them, item by item. When we have an outcome of the
poll, we should have a second poll which is basically yes or no to
the lot to confirm that the contents still is such that the idea of
a RFC half-way still is worthwhile. We would still then have to go
through the sections again and make a final brush-up of the language
and grammar.
The list of items that we vote on, could well include things that we
don't have in the draft yet.
-- Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, sommar@algonet.se