From: Erland Sommarskog (sommar@algonet.se)
Date: Mon Sep 04 2000 - 09:19:57 CDT
Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk) writes:
> If injectors can pick and choose which of various headers they can add,
> then you leave it open to scammers to insert their own version of the ones
> thay know their local injector is _not_ going to add.
What did we say about reinjection? If I run Hamster at home and I have
Hamster to insert Injector-Info, surely my ISP must have the right
to through that away?
> I think this is also the reason why the Complaints-To should be part of
> the same header.
That's a good argument.
But we could have both Complaints-To as a separte header, and as part of
Injector-Info.
Mind you, that if we only have Injector-Info, the spammer can still
include a Complaints-To to confused.
-- Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, sommar@algonet.se