From: Bill Davidsen (davidsen@prodigy.com)
Date: Tue Sep 05 2000 - 10:11:58 CDT
In <G07CE3.EDy@clw.cs.man.ac.uk>,
chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk (Charles Lindsey) wrote:
> In <ylitshuonu.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
> >I don't have any real disagreements with the proposed new header on its
> >own merits, but that part of things makes me nervous.
>
> It's more or a replacement for X-Trace than for NNTP-Posting-Host. But
> then X-Trace usually duplicates NNTP-Posting-Host, which is wasteful.
Yes, a good reason to drop NNTP-Posting-Host. INN currently puts all
the useful info in a single place, X-Trace, and while the implementation
might be changed to add all the song and dance in the recent proposal, I
think the idea of having a single header for the trace info intended for
machine reading is good.
I also agree with Russ that Complaints should be by itself, so people
can find it.
-- -bill davidsen (davidsen@prodigy.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me