From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 05 2000 - 04:52:08 CDT
In <yln1hn4ukr.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
>This works fine for headers with technical intent; it doesn't work nearly
>as well for articles with social intent. If we want to get people to use
>the value of Complaints-To, it pretty much has to be on the majority of
>articles; otherwise, it's just another weird header that people might be
>adding themselves.
It (or its Injector-Info equivalent) should be in the headers of articles
posted via ISPs that have abuse departments). But I would not expect it in
articles posted from company sites or most universities.
Would it help for complaints-to to be (by convention) the first parameter
of Injector-Info?
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506 Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5