From: Clive D.W. Feather (clive@on-the-train.demon.co.uk)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 10:46:41 CDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>1. Signed headers
>A. Do we proceed on the basis of draft-lindsey-usefor-signed-00.txt?
YES
>B. In the event the answer to A is YES, do we canonicalise dates as days since
> Jan 1st 1970 (in which case a time hh:mm:60 canonicalises the same as
I take it you mean "seconds since ...".
[date-time syntax], but only a weak preference.
>2. "ought"
YES
>3. Mail-Copies-To
I don't recall its "present informal usage" well enough to vote.
- --
Clive D.W. Feather | Internet Expert | Work: <clive@demon.net>
Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 | Demon Internet | Home: <clive@davros.org>
Fax: +44 20 8371 1037 | Thus plc | Web: <http://www.davros.org>
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1
iQEVAwUBObZm4SNAHP3TFZrhAQFtGQf/VmqSlfcPagC6rs2BzezBMWvAnERLUez3
3spMQFYAOzfyAc00hfxZBNHNfkCtRV/inj/BLWa5PFlfTwt2x46+NvkCs+t3SQGI
IkI9IHqVt7sDmuoFygjJXzQGwXb8PG2oK3opfzQLNefpEq+YuuJ1CSuo1y/J/v31
v1NC5U7ftKMx7UIH/6+rFwrHv5yE9XSyfTr6FS+6+qNBm3lpxnswtOxjQhEQJTM1
W6AMwbPc9w0zD1k3nMykMYH7vlVac8L4EmxhgEFkm5gp7BBPcXoxEIoYo6TLnXaw
kKOtJIsJ381dpEAThyVmfJnmh4fwpSlastMG4On0uKQwk2YIyPtIZw==
=s3JF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----