From: Erland Sommarskog (sommar-usefor@algonet.se)
Date: Thu Sep 07 2000 - 16:30:23 CDT
Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk) writes:
> In <200009041419.QAA11923@kairos.algonet.se> Erland Sommarskog (sommar@algonet.se) writes:
> >But we could have both Complaints-To as a separte header, and as part of
> >Injector-Info.
>
> That would be redundant.
But it would be redudant with a very good reason, and we should of
course explain why in a note.
>But it might be useful to establish a convention that complaints-to
>should be the first parameter of Injector-Info, to give it some prominence.
That may still be too well hidden.
And it permits spammers to have their own. Of course they can still
put in "Abuse-address: " or whatever. But with "Complains-To: " as a
legit header, at least the spammers get fair competition. With only
Injector-Info, they have a lead.
-- Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, sommar@algonet.se