From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Sep 29 2000 - 05:07:09 CDT
In <ylsnqkma0o.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
>Russ Allbery <rra@Stanford.EDU> writes:
>After thinking about this some more, how about:
> If the article does not contain a Mail-Copies-To header, it SHOULD be
> treated as if it contained "Mail-Copies-To: never" unless the poster
> indicated a different preference via some other means (such as a request
> in the body of the message for an e-mailed copy).
I don't see what that gains you over my present wording, especially with
the slight change to it I made in the preceding post.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506 Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5