Re: RFC 1036 Replacement IETF Draft Available

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 04:33:40 CDT


In <1erq3xp.90nz7a1fauz7tM%planb@newsreaders.com> planb@newsreaders.com (J.B. Moreno) writes:

>Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> wrote:

>> In news.software.readers, Andrew Gierth
>> <andrew@erlenstar.demon.co.uk> writes:
>>
>> > hmm. I think I need to take a few potshots at that too - the folding
>> > stuff is just bogus nonsense for headers like Path, Newsgroups or Xref
>> > which need to be reliably machine-parsed.
>>
>> I wish you luck; I and a few other vocal people managed to get rid of MIME
>> attributes in those headers (aie) and I settled for good enough.

>Even if it is going to be allowed, it should be a SHOULD not at this
>point because of incompatibilities with current software.

Folding of Newsgroups headers is indeed a SHOULD NOT in the present draft
(but also a MUST accept). Path and Xref are already foldable under RFC
1036.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.