From: Ralph Babel (rbabel@babylon.pfm-mainz.de)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 15:33:25 CDT
John Stanley wrote:
> Charles Lindsey wrote:
>
>> I think it is up to our chairman to say to what
>> extent we should be revisiting issues that we
>> debated and decided one or two years ago.
>
> I think it is up to each of us to find patently
> absurd statements in this draft and prevent them
> from becoming part of the final standard. Every
> absurd comment in the final standard is just one more
> thing that will keep it from ever being implemented.
Well put! IMO, the editor of an RFC-to-be should
understand what "RFC" stands for. In case we're
looking for a new editor, John has my vote.
This draft needs an enema.