Re: "Ought"

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Erland Sommarskog (sommar@algonet.se)
Date: Fri Jan 05 2001 - 17:41:17 CST


Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> writes:
> For leaving out the .sig in followups, record me as another SHOULD.
> (That's no change, but at least there's a majority.)

Apart from that think it is not a very good idea altogether, I find
it difficult to believe that we'll ever manage to explain to IETF
that there is an interoperability issue at hand.

Thus, insisting on SHOULD here will only delay the promotion of Usefor
as an RFC. Then again, what is not delaying, so who cares anyway...

--
Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, sommar@algonet.se


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.