From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 04:30:58 CST
In <20010113202300.21391.qmail@kairos.algonet.se> sommar@algonet.se (Erland Sommarskog) writes:
>I much prefer Dave Barr's wording, but I agree with Russ and others that
>the MUST in the note cannot be motivated. As long it is a note, John
>Moreno's suggestion "can, and should," makes sense. Alternative, remove
>"NOTE:" and use Ought.
I see no problem with using "Ought" in a NOTE. Agreed that SHOULD/MUST in
a NOTE are dubious.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Voice/Fax: +44 161 436 6131 Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5