Re: Oughtification of Section 5

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel@acm.org)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 03:39:25 CST


In <200101180630.BAA13716@panix6.panix.com>, on 01/18/2001
   at 01:30 AM, Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> said:

>Given that they can get privacy by using one of the Usenet providers
>that offers it, for a small monthly cost (<$5), I don't see why the
>default shouldn't be to use the raw IP address (as is presently the
>case).

One reason is that it isn't static. And yes, I know that the privacy
advocates don't want a static token.

 

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2
     Team OS/2
     Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.