Re: C.T.E. and message/partial

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Clive D.W. Feather (clive@demon.net)
Date: Mon Jul 02 2001 - 03:29:56 CDT


Brad Templeton said:
> But once again, if a site has declared a policy of not wanting articles
> larger than a megabyte, does that mean the poster should split into parts
> to get around the policy?

That depends on why it has the policy. It may be that they don't want
*pieces* larger than 1Mb, because of the way they handle them internally.
You don't know.

> Anyway, my main point remains that if most systems can handle arbitrary
> large articles, and the new spec encourages that, shouldn't we tell people
> to avoid message/partial unless they know of a special reason to use it?

I would suggest that, *if* we need limits at all:
- software MUST be able to handle articles up to 1Mb;
- agents MUST NOT prevent the use of message/partial just because the
  whole message or a given piece would be under some limit;
- unless they have a reason to, users Ought Not to split messages less
  than 1Mb-minus-delta, but any enforcement should be no more than a
  "are you sure ?".

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive@demon.net>   | Tel:  +44 20 8371 1138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive@davros.org>  | Fax:  +44 20 8371 1037
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | DFax: +44 20 8371 4037
Thus plc            |                            | Mobile: +44 7973 377646


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.