Re: C.T.E. and message/partial

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Jul 09 2001 - 05:56:26 CDT


In <ylhewoql2j.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:

>Erland Sommarskog <sommar@algonet.se> writes:

>> And the point is that we don't want to them to routinely reuse the
>> MIME-ification stuff they have for mail. I've seen to many mail messages
>> QP:ing the universe, or even producing Base-64 out of an ordinary text
>> message. I don't want that crap in news.

>> The benefit for mail could be that what they rewrite for news will slip
>> into mail as well.

>It sounds like you want to change MIME. You're in the wrong working group
>to do that. ietf-822@imc.org is two doors down on the left.

Yes, but he doesn't want to change MIME. MIME already permits a certain
flexibility as to when and how to encode. Erland (and I) just want to
exercise that flexibility in a certain way for News, and Erland is just
suggesting that our practice might then slip into mail.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.