Re: C.T.E. and message/partial

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Jean-Marc Desperrier (jean-marc.desperrier@certplus.com)
Date: Mon Jul 23 2001 - 03:33:30 CDT


sommar@kairos.kairos.algonet.se wrote:

> Jean-Marc Desperrier <jean-marc.desperrier@certplus.com> writes:
> > There will be people using utf-8, and other using local encoding for
> > headers in the same group.
>
> Yes, there will be a transition period. But we have been through this
> before, when we went from 7-bit to 8-bit.
>
> But in difference to that transition, newsreaders can actually apply
> some heuristics. A newsreader can easily detect that a string which is
> supposed to be UTF-8 is not, and can thus in such case use a local charset
> as a fallback.
>
> And RFC2047 only solves this half-way. Readers that don't grasp UTF-8
> will need to be rewritten anyway, and while rewriting the authors
> can implement the fallback.

Which is why it would be a good thing to describe that such a fall-back may be needed in a note
in USEFOR, and describe how it would work.

I'm not able to find anything like that right now in the draft.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.