Re: Archive -- what do we want to happen?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 05:55:25 CDT


In <1euaokv.4yt0layiefygM%dennis.scp@multiweb.nl> dennis.scp@multiweb.nl (Dennis SCP) writes:

>The only definition of an Archive is a time constraint. Just define a
>standard time constraint. Say three months or 100 days. It should apply
>to the article itself, whether on a server or in a archive, otherwise it
>is useless. Anyone who does not comply denies the author his/her wishes
>and will have to answer to their own law. Simple as that.

No, fixing an arbitrary time limit will solve nothing. For some groups,
100 days might be far too long. For some announce groups it might be far
too short. I think all the rest of us are agreed that this is a subjective
issue which the standard should not take a position on, beyone setting out
broad principles. Let the Courts argue out individual cases, if they must.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.