From: Brian Palmer (bpalmer@stanford.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 21:02:17 CDT
Kent Landfield <kent@landfield.com> writes:
> We don't need a definition of an archiving agent any more than we need a
> definition of a transport agent.
Ah, thanks for pointing that out. What's wrong with inserting a
definition for
A 'transport agent' is an agent which transports articles between
two other agents.
I'm a big fan of having one place which defines all this stuff. Even
if it's a fairly straightforward (meaningless?) definition, having
everything defined in one place makes it easy to look to see if
there's a special meaning associated with words.
-- WARNING This Product Attracts Every Other Piece of Matter in the Universe, Including the Products of Other Manufacturers, with a Force Proportional to the Product of the Masses and Inversely Proportional to the Distance Between Them.