From: Ralph Babel (rbabel@babylon.pfm-mainz.de)
Date: Sat Apr 06 2002 - 02:55:15 CST
Charles Lindsey wrote:
> Paul Overell wrote:
>
>> I don't like this because, with the existing syntax,
>> it unnecessarily denounces RFC1036 compliant software
>> to be non-compliant.
>
> Yes, but on that basis you can NEVER
> change a syntax from an earlier standard.
If you want incompatible syntax, use a new header.