Re: Collected syntax

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Paul Overell (paulo@turnpike.com)
Date: Mon Feb 11 2002 - 03:24:35 CST


In message <Gr8Cpq.I1y@clw.cs.man.ac.uk>, Charles Lindsey
<chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> writes
>In <Gr09nL.AHI@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk (Charles Lindsey) writes:
>
>
>
>I now have:
>
>2.4. Syntax
>
>2.4.1. Syntax Notation
>
> This standard uses the Augmented Backus Naur Form described in [RFC
> 2234]. Additionally, some syntax rules are given in the form of
> schemata from each of which several rules in the [RFC 2234] format
> can be derived. For example, the schema
>
> {USENET}-header = {USENET}-name ":" 1*SP {USENET}-content
> *( [CFWS] ";" ( {USENET}-parameter /
> other-parameter ) )
>

Since all {USENET}-content starts with [CFWS], and we only require a
single space after the colon, this should be

      {USENET}-header = {USENET}-name ":" SP {USENET}-content
                             *( [CFWS] ";" ( {USENET}-parameter /
                                             other-parameter ) )

(This just removes a trivial parsing ambiguity, it is not a material
change to the syntax).

Regards

-- 
Paul Overell                                             T U R N P I K E



New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.