Re: Collected syntax

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Fri Feb 15 2002 - 09:47:59 CST


In <VmhkfRD59Na8QAx+@pillar.turnpike.com>, on 02/12/2002
   at 09:25 AM, Paul Overell <paulo@turnpike.com> said:

>None of the drafts have ever contained the collected syntax. It was
>only when you posted the collect syntax here that I realized that
>syntax was incomplete and was instead relying on readers to use your
>template scheme to generate the missing productions.

If the syntax description includes all of the required templates then
it is not incomplete. There's nothing wrong with a W-grammar if[1] it
is properly commented.

[1] The ALGOL-68 grammar was not properly commented. Blame the
authors, not the notation.

 

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2
     Team OS/2
     Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.