Re: Sender header

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Clive D.W. Feather (clive@demon.net)
Date: Mon Feb 25 2002 - 04:06:04 CST


Charles Lindsey said:
> The current draft is MAY for adding it

Sender, I presume [I'm losing track of the context here]

> (but with a discouraging NOTE) and
> a SHOULD NOT for changing it if it is already there.

SHOULD NOT change any header (apart from the explicitly permitted ones), I
take it ?

I'd like it to be clear that "entity" doesn't mean "a specific human
being", because that's about the only valid point I've seen John Stanley's
stuff produce. However, I don't have the time to do the rewrite myself.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive@demon.net>   | Tel:  +44 20 8371 1138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive@davros.org>  | Fax:  +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc            |                            | NOTE: fax number change


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.