Re: Avoiding X-Headers

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 01 2002 - 09:01:59 CST


In <Pine.BSI.3.91.1011231205935.4003B-100000@spsystems.net> Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> writes:

>Agreed; when it's deployment time, that's what you should do. But the X-
>convention remains useful and desirable for preliminary experimenting.
>Since any X- header which appears on the net at large is, by definition,
>an escaped experiment, it should always be ignored.

But when is "deployment time"?

Some hotheads will say "tonight, as soon as I have finished hacking this
code".

Others will say "only when a standards track RFC has been accepted by the
IESG".

And there will exist every stage you can imagine between those extremes
:-( .

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.