Re: Avoiding X-Headers

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Clive D.W. Feather (clive@demon.net)
Date: Wed Jan 02 2002 - 08:29:40 CST


Russ Allbery said:
> I think Henry's arguing for the outlawing of propagation of X- headers to
> Usenet as a whole. Use X- headers for localized hacks or local
> experimentation, but give the header a real name if you're going to
> distribute it to all of Usenet, even as an experiment. But I'm not sure
> that I've read his argument correctly.
>
>> The main point for me was that putting "X-" on the headers is a poor
>> design, and should be removed from the standard.
>
> It's still valuable to have a way of designating local headers. With the
> benefit of hindsight, we could have built into news software a refusal to
> propagate X- headers off the local server. Probably too late for that
> now.

Are we about to revitalize the L- header proposal ?

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive@demon.net>   | Tel:  +44 20 8371 1138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive@davros.org>  | Fax:  +44 20 8371 4037
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc            |                            |


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.