Re: Avoiding X-Headers

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 07:46:40 CST


In <20020102183517.GB30478@k0deZ.scriptkiddie.net> greg andruk <gja@meowing.net> writes:

>There is the RFC2822 Comments: header. For purely human-parsed text, that
>is probably enough.

Yes, but there is an awful lot of supposedly "human-parsed text" that does
get machine parsed, usually in killfiles, XHDR and XPAT commands, and all
sorts of ad hoc filters. Comments are not particularly good for that.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.