Re: Sender header

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: John Stanley (stanley@peak.org)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 17:55:34 CST


Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk):

>Well I put that wording in of Dec 20th (and Seth, at least was happy with
>it).

And I am not.

> That is how it will remain unless someone speaks up.

Be very very careful using the "silence is approval" argument in this
group. Were this true, I could use your silence regarding the proposed
prohibition against injectors playing with From and Sender headers as
agreement with me, when the truth is the archive just stopped working for
two weeks, and is still having problems. Or do you agree with me and have
you inserted the prohibitions where they belong?


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.