Re: Sender header

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Jan 05 2002 - 14:16:56 CST


In <Pine.LNX.3.91.1020104132319.16569D-100000@darkstar.prodigy.com> Bill Davidsen <davidsen@prodigy.com> writes:

>On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Seth Breidbart wrote:

>> I agree that Injector-Info is a better place to do it; however, that
>> header might be included by a poster and signed, so the "breaking of a
>> signed article" problem cannot be avoided.

>Is there a reason I don't recall for why we would allow this to be a
>user-provided header? At all?

Injector-Info is NOT a user provided header (and if the user provides one,
our draft instruct the injector to remove it).

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.