Re: Sender header

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Jan 05 2002 - 14:19:34 CST


In <Pine.LNX.4.10.10201041445380.17458-100000@spock.peak.org> John Stanley <stanley@peak.org> writes:

>Seth Breidbart (sethb@panix.com):

>>> A - Sender is going to be signed just like From,

>>That would break the signature, so the poster shouldn't do it.

It would be unwise (though not prohibited) to include Sender in a signature.

My draft signature proposal carefully excludes Sender from the default set
that is normally signed, and also explicitly points out that signing it is
not a good idea.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.