From: Kai Henningsen (kaih@khms.westfalen.de)
Date: Sun Jan 06 2002 - 08:04:00 CST
chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk (Charles Lindsey) wrote on 01.01.02 in <Gp9LKz.4Gu@clw.cs.man.ac.uk>:
> Anyway, possibilities for our present draft are
>
> (1a) Allow non-X-headers for comment/vanity/local/superseding purposes.
> (1b) Insist on X-headers for comment/vanity/local/superseding purposes.
> (2a) Allow non-X-headers for experimental protocols
> (2b) Insist on X-headers for experimental protocols
You missed
(3a) Allow standardizing X-headers
(3b) Insist on not standardizing X-headers
For comparision, RFC 2822 is 1a/2a/3a (in that it - intentionally - does
not single out any X-prefix). I think we should do exactly the same.
MfG Kai