From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 05:27:54 CST
In <Pine.LNX.3.91.1020111103955.8061C-100000@darkstar.prodigy.com> Bill Davidsen <davidsen@prodigy.com> writes:
>Sounds right. There is no pressing reason to get rid of X-headers, and
>some serious effort to actually make them go away. Therefore, high
>effort, small gain, sounds like a good thing to not do.
Yes, I agree with that. Are you happy with the wording I recently posted,
which confirms that situation, but encourages non-X-headers if
widely-delpoyed software is expected to need to understand them.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5