Re: Sender header

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: J.B. Moreno (planb@newsreaders.com)
Date: Mon Jan 28 2002 - 15:51:55 CST


On 1/26/02 5:04 PM, Erland Sommarskog at <sommar-usefor@algonet.se> wrote:

> John Stanley <stanley@peak.org> writes:

>> Why are people so adamant that the newsserver must help spammers instead
>> of helping the users? Why do people insist on thinking that injectors can
>> know what they cannot?
>
> The only one who appears to be adamant is you. I am not insisting on
> anything. I just think that your main argument - that the server does
> not know - you make for outlawing Sender is flawed and that your general
> sentiment - the privacy issue - does not warrant killing an existing header.

Yeah, his argument is severely flawed -- perhaps the server admin requires
the poster to appear before him with 3 types of idea and 2 signed affidavits
stating that he is indeed the authorized "sender" before allowing any post
to be injected.

We don't know if they know, and we don't know if they don't; that's up to
them to decide.

-- 
J.B. Moreno


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.