Re: UTF-8 and RFC 2047

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: greg andruk (gja@meowing.net)
Date: Wed Jul 03 2002 - 14:06:26 CDT


Charles Lindsey wrote:

>In <3D20786F.3020702@free.fr> jean-marc desperrier <dico.fj@free.fr> writes:
>
>
>
>>And I will pursue that I did not see much answer about the fact most
>>readers, including xnews, including gravity (use super gravity),
>>including pan, pine, now understand RFC2047, and that the same is not
>>true for UTF-8, so the current text of the NOTE in the draft is
>>misrepresenting the reality.
>>
>>
>
>No, I think it remains true that there are newsreaders out there that do
>not understand RFC 2047.
>

Yes, and there are still newsreaders that don't understand or generate
things like References: and Followup-To:. Oh well.

> Heck, all those 152,100 articles that Andrew
>found must have come from user agents that would not or could not
>_generate_ RFC 2047, in which case I doubt they were able to _decode_ it
>either. And why do all those articles with naked ISO-8859-1 headers appear
>in the French newsgroups if it is not because of the existence of
>newsreaders that are incapable of generating ot decoding RFC 2047, or
>both?
>

Popular newsreaders like Outlook Express have a user-settable option to
generate 7- or 8-bit headers. It is incorrect to draw conclusions about
what newsreaders can display based on what is posted.

>
>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.