From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 04:02:43 CDT
In <200207091712.MAA02122@rkive.landfield.com> Kent Landfield <kent@landfield.com> writes:
>Lets take this off line... The situation is this... What you are talking
>about is having all messages generated with a
> Reply-To: usenet-format@landfield.com
>I have been beat up over this before when I had it set to the list. People
>didn't like every response, even private ones going to the list.
Yes, every list I have been on has had this battle. I much prefer Reply-To
to be set to the list, and on the ukcrypto list they had a vote where that
option won by a fairly small majority. You can't please everybody :-( .
Actually, it doesn't affect me, as I gate this list to a local newsgroup
and then do a followup rather than a reply. My sys file knows tp mail it
to the list (only). I can easily generate a personal reply when I need to,
which isn't often.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5