Re: [Meta] List's Reply-To (was: UTF-8 and RFC 2047)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 11 2002 - 05:03:11 CDT


In <20020709202224.B854@roxel.ms.sub.org> Dirk Nimmich <nimmich@muenster.de> writes:

>Kent Landfield wrote:

>> Lets take this off line... The situation is this... What you are
>> talking about is having all messages generated with a
>>
>> Reply-To: usenet-format@landfield.com

>No. We are talking about having no change at all to the Reply-To
>header because it destroys any contents the author wished to be
>set.

Yes, but an intelligent agent could arrange only to set the Reply-To to
the list if the author had not provided one already.

>Right. That's why modern mail readers have functions to distinguish
>between answers to the author only (reply), to the list only (list
>reply), and to both (group reply).

I have not yet seen a mail reader that is aware of whether or not a
message came from a mailing list. How does it tell?

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.