From: Clive D.W. Feather (clive@demon.net)
Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 15:17:29 CDT
Charles Lindsey said:
> If you read the paragraph immediately preceding the one quoted, you will
> see that it sets out the relationship between ISO 10646 and Unicode, so it
> does not really matter which one is mentioned here. I chose to mention ISO
> 10646 because AIUI that still pays lip service to the possibility of 32
> bit codes, whereas the Unicode people seem to have gone quite away from them.
>
> Practically speaking, of course, they are dead. But UTF-8 still nominally
> covers them (and that includes the latest UTF-8 draft).
Okay.
-- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive@demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive@davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 Thus plc | | NOTE: fax number change