From: Jean-Marc Desperrier (jean-marc.desperrier@certplus.com)
Date: Tue Jun 04 2002 - 09:34:48 CDT
>
>
>Charles Lindsey said:
>
>
>>Practically speaking, of course, they are dead. But UTF-8 still nominally
>>covers them (and that includes the latest UTF-8 draft).
>>
>>
I'd be very surprised.
The latest documents that _I_'ve seen only keep the UTF-8 sequence up to
4 byte (covering the same space as UTF-16), and suppress the 5 and 6
byte sequences necessary to cover the whole 32 bits space.