Re: .invalid

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 06:43:32 CDT


In <86660xieef.fsf@rowlf.interhack.net> Matt Curtin <cmcurtin@interhack.net> writes:

>Do we yet hold the IETF record for the longest active working group
>not to produce as much as an RFC?

No, the NNTPEXT working group started before we did, and still has not
produced its main RFC (though it did produce a subsidiary one on existing
extensions).

And NNTPEXT was only supposed to be documenting current practice (though
it does go a little bit further, for example in the direction of UTF-8).
Our charter explicitly allows us to introduce a few new features.

Another example is DRUMS, whose total lifespan it probably more than ours,
and that too was merely intended to document existing practice.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.