Re: .invalid

From: Frank Ellermann (Frank.Ellermann@t-online.de)
Date: Fri Jun 07 2002 - 00:38:19 CDT

• Next message: John Stanley: "Re: what's an "address" (was Re: .invalid)"
• Previous message: Henry Spencer: "what's an "address" (was Re: .invalid)"
• In reply to: Henry Spencer: ".invalid (was Re: Internal LAST CALL)"
• Next in thread: Charles Lindsey: "Re: Internal LAST CALL"

Henry Spencer wrote:

> I don't want to waste my time composing a reply to some jerk
> who didn't provide a valid reply address, so I want to know
> about it beforehand.

ACK. I definitely don't like "properly munged addresses" as
in John's examples. TLD .invalid is bad enough for everybody.

                         Bye, Frank

• Next message: John Stanley: "Re: what's an "address" (was Re: .invalid)"
• Previous message: Henry Spencer: "what's an "address" (was Re: .invalid)"
• In reply to: Henry Spencer: ".invalid (was Re: Internal LAST CALL)"
• Next in thread: Charles Lindsey: "Re: Internal LAST CALL"