From: Erland Sommarskog (sommar@algonet.se)
Date: Sat Jun 08 2002 - 15:48:50 CDT
"Forrest J. Cavalier III" <mibsoft@epix.net> writes:
> How is this draft going to be relevant? Unless implementors
> are of the perception that life will be better after
> implementation, then they aren't going along with it.
>
> It surely would be easier for implmenters if the present
> draft were split:
> - USEFOR Non-English character sets.
> - USEFOR Header extension methods
> - USEFOR Interoperation with mail and archives
> - USEFOR MIME Encapsulation
> - USEFOR Verification, Security, and Privacy
> - USEFOR Server control messages
>
Was that information that there working groups that has been working
longer than we have that prompted this? It is in fact the T-shirt
you are after "I was in the longest-working IETF group?".
Personally, I like to see this document at least try to become an RFC.
-- Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, sommar@algonet.se