Re: [B5mods] Encapsulated submissions - Summary

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Jay Denebeim (denebeim@deepthot.org)
Date: Sat Jun 08 2002 - 23:24:04 CDT


On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Charles Lindsey wrote:

> On Wed, 05 Jun 2002 04:26:42 -0700
> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> said...
>
> > > But tell me, how many groups are actually hand moderated these days?
> >
> > I'd say most of the moderated groups are still hand-moderated, although
> > there are a growing number of groups moderated by nearly as many different
> > automated programs as there are groups.
> >
> > > Is it not much more common to use a bot (e.g. stump) which applies some
> > > filtering rules (crosspost limits, blacklists, etc) and then posts it
> > > automatically?
> >
> > Nope.
>
> That surprises me somewhat. In uk.*, it is almost universal for groups
> to be moderated by means of a filter-bot such as stump.

And then he goes on to explain that usefor is still planning to use a mime
type. Look, most moderators post these things by hand. Many of them are
not technical. Encapsulation is a bad thing for these folks.

Jay

-- 
* Jay Denebeim  Moderator       rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated *
* newsgroup submission address: b5mod@deepthot.org                *
* moderator contact address:    b5mod-request@deepthot.org        *
* personal contact address:     denebeim@deepthot.org             *


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.