From: John Stanley (stanley@peak.org)
Date: Wed Jun 12 2002 - 14:07:55 CDT
Henry Spencer (henry@spsystems.net):
> I've given up on responding to John's screeds point by point, for reasons
> of time and blood pressure,
I'm sorry it takes you so much time to answer the questions I ask. I had
hoped they would clarify the reason you believe what you do, but if it
elevates your blood pressure too much to answer questions like "why does
your followup agent care what is in the From header", or to deal with a
step-by-step explanation of how one gets from point A to point B, I guess
you should take a medical leave from this group.
> but to my mind they justify, at most, small
> wording changes to clarify the existing intent.
I'm sorry, but if you did not object to anything in the draft, then the
only assumption that can be made is that draft 7 correctly represented
your existing intent. You had a chance to object if it did not. I don't
recall you objecting to the latest version of the draft, or to any
previous versions which did not get changed.
Now you say that the draft didn't express the "intent", but it wasn't
important enough to speak up until after last call. Didn't someone try
yelling at me for speaking up after last call? Hmmm, can't recall who it
was... and who didn't remember that I had spoken up a long time ago. Can
you help me out on this one, Henry?