From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Sun Jun 16 2002 - 13:20:00 CDT
In <Gxp992.90q@clw.cs.man.ac.uk>, on 06/14/2002
at 02:22 PM, "Charles Lindsey" <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> said:
>I think the problem is not my new text, but the wording of step 10 in
>8.2.2. I think the change that you and John are asking for is that an
>injector SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT insert a Sender-header (currently, it
>just points out that it is a dumb idea).
Two changes. One is to put it back the way it was. You removed a MUST
NOT without any consensus to do so. The other change is to add an
additional MUST NOT.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
Team OS/2
Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------