Re: Sender header

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Mar 04 2002 - 06:43:37 CST


In <20020301111818.GI48327@finch-staff-1.demon.net> "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive@demon.net> writes:

>>
>> This sentence is somewhat confusing, in that it zigs and zags. How about
>>

>You've lost a bit too much of the detail. Try this:

> The injecting agent MUST NOT alter the body of the article in
> any way. It MAY add other headers not already provided
> by the poster, but SHOULD NOT alter, delete, or reorder any
> existing header other than "tracing" headers (such as
> Injector-Info and Complaints-To, q.v.).

OK, it now says

   10. The injecting agent MUST NOT alter the body of the article in
        any way. It MAY add other headers not already provided by the
        poster, but SHOULD NOT alter, delete, or reorder any existing
        header, with the specific exception of "tracing" headers such as
        Injector-Info and Complaints-To, which are to be removed as
        already mentioned.

which should also satisfy Erland's point.

>> NOTE: The addition of non-mandatory headers by the injecting
>> agent may alter the posting agent's preferred presentation of
>> information. Ideally, the injecting agent will comply with the
>> poster's preferences; in particular, adding a Sender-header
>> that exposes a sender's mailbox is deprecated in favor of
>> adding tracing information via the Injector-Info header (see
>> 6.19.1 for usage notes on Injector-Info).

>I could live with that. However, *if* the sender's mailbox is being added
>in accordance with local policy, surely Sender is a better place for it ?
>Try:

> in particular, adding a Sender header that exposes a sender's
> mailbox has privacy implications, and it may be more desirable
> to add tracing information via the Injector-Info header (see
> 6.19.1 for usage notes on Injector-Info).

I think Brian Palmer's "deprecated" was a bit too strong, but I think your
"more desirable" is too weak.

Essentially, we have some existing practice which we do not entirely like,
so we would like to apply gentle pressure to have that practice changed.

What I now have is:

        NOTE: The addition of non-mandatory headers by the injecting
        agent may alter the posting agent's preferred presentation of
        information. Ideally, the injecting agent will comply with the
        poster's preferences; in particular, adding a Sender-header that
        exposes a sender's mailbox has privacy implications, and it is
        preferable to add any such tracing information via the Injector-Info
        header as set out in 6.19.1.

As to whether we mention these issues in 6.2, I think not. The wording
there is addressed to posters who add a Sender header themselves (the
boss's secretary or other such special cases).

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.