From: Clive D.W. Feather (clive@demon.net)
Date: Tue Mar 05 2002 - 12:03:57 CST
Charles Lindsey said:
> Yes, there is still a problem to be addressed in that area. But I am
> waiting to see if the current discussion in ietf-822 turns up anything
> useful before deciding which way to jump.
Okay, so long as you have the point noted.
>> Why isn't date-time defined here ?
> Like it says: "The content syntax makes use of syntax defined in [RFC
> 2822]". It has been general policy throughout the draft not to repeat
> syntax defined eslewhere (except for some very basic and frequently used
> stuff in 2.4.3).
>
> I have however, reproduced all the borrowed syntax in the Collected
> Syntax Appendix, where it is carefully identified as such.
Okay.
-- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive@demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive@davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 Thus plc | | NOTE: fax number change